[IPsec] Re: [EXT] Re: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention and RFC 7296 update

Sun, 29 Mar 2026 07:47:28 -0700

I support this. 
—
Regards,
Uri

Secure Resilient Systems and Technologies
MIT Lincoln Laboratory

On Mar 29, 2026, at 10:25, Wang Guilin <[email protected]> wrote:


> What do other people in the WG thing? If others agree, then this document needs to be updated to say it updates IKEv2 RFC 7296. I support this. Guilin 发件人：Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ iki. fi> 收件人：ipsec@ ietf. org <ipsec@ ietf. org> 抄 送：draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention@ ietf. org
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside the Laboratory.
 
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

> What do other people in the WG thing? If others agree, then this document needs to be updated to say it updates IKEv2 RFC 7296.

I support this. 

Guilin


发件人：Tero Kivinen <[email protected]>
时 间：2026-03-29 01:37:44
主 题：[IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention and RFC 7296 update

I think that the draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention should
actually Update the IKEv2 RFC 7296, as this extension is something
that would be needed for old implementations too, and IKEv2
implementors should read and understand this document when
implementing or updating IKEv2.

What do other people in the WG thing? If others agree, then this
document needs to be updated to say it updates IKEv2 RFC 7296.
--
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
 _______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to