> What do other people in the WG thing? If others agree, then this document > needs to be updated to say it updates IKEv2 RFC 7296.
I support this. Guilin 发件人：Tero Kivinen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 收件人：[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 抄 送：[email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 时 间：2026-03-29 01:37:44 主 题：[IPsec] draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention and RFC 7296 update I think that the draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-downgrade-prevention should actually Update the IKEv2 RFC 7296, as this extension is something that would be needed for old implementations too, and IKEv2 implementors should read and understand this document when implementing or updating IKEv2. What do other people in the WG thing? If others agree, then this document needs to be updated to say it updates IKEv2 RFC 7296. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
