> On 12 Nov 2015, at 12:13 PM, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > There have been no additional comment on the list, and we have had one > positive review from an implementer [1]. Is there any reason to wait > further with WG last calling this document? Its dependency on > draft-irtf-cfrg-curves is in the RFC editors queue already. > > Thanks, > /Simon > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/vS1sy2ROhA6twEe7QwX1ISXtLVM
OK, so here’s two comments: 1. See Ilari’s pr for RFC4492bis [2]. Do we want similar name changes? 2. We make no mention of EdDSA signatures. I know they should just work with RFC 7427, but do we want to mention them and give the OIDs? Yoav [2] https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pull/16 _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
