Of interest to the WG

Forwarded message:

From: The IESG <[email protected]>
To: IETF-Announce <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], The IESG <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Protocol Action: 'Generic Raw Public Key Support for IKEv2' to Proposed Standard (draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-14.txt)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:10:17 -0700

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Generic Raw Public Key Support for IKEv2'
(draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey-14.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.

The IESG contact person is Kathleen Moriarty.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kivinen-ipsecme-oob-pubkey/





Technical Summary

The document extends IKEv2 with generic support for multiple
formats of raw public keys. This is expected to be used in IOT
settings and/or setups using DANE. Raw RSA keys were removed
from IKEv2 in its latest iteration (RFC 7296) in anticipation of
this document.

Working Group Summary

There was not enough IPsecME WG energy behind the draft,
so it never became a WG document. But the chairs do
support its publication as an AD-sponsored Standards Track
RFC so as not to lose an existing IKEv2 feature
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg08358.html).
The document updates RFC 7296.

Document Quality

This is a small extension to the protocol and
it was written by experienced IPsec implementors;
moreover, it re-enacts and extends functionality that's
been there for a while.  It has had several reviews by
experienced IPsecMe WG participants.

idnits should a reference to an obsoleted RFC, this is
correct as that is the appropriate reference.
-- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 5996
  (Obsoleted by RFC 7296)

Personnel

The document shepherd is Yaron Sheffer.
The responsible Area Director is Kathleen Moriarty.


_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Reply via email to