On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Apologies, I did spot this before, I've just been tied up with other things > and dropping everything non-critical on the floor, so didn't get round to > replying before it slipped my mind again. > > In summary, I hate it, but mostly because the whole situation of calling > iommu_probe_device off the back of driver probe is fundamentally broken. I'm > still a few steps away from fixing that properly, at which point I can just > as well rip all these little bodges out again. If it really does need > mitigating in the meantime (i.e. this is real-world async probe, not just > some contrived testcase), then I can't easily think of any cleaner hack, so, > > Acked-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
Alright, applied this now. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
