RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

Wed, 25 May 2022 01:59:56 -0700 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> Sent: 17 May 2022 08:18
> To: 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' <[email protected]>; Robin Murphy
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Linuxarm <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; wanghuiqiang <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: 13 May 2022 10:50
> > To: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> > [email protected]
> > Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <[email protected]>;
> > Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; Linuxarm <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; wanghuiqiang <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> >
> > [with Christoph's correct email address]
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2022-05-10 08:23, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > > > Hi Joerg/Robin,
> > > >
> > > > I think this series is now ready to be merged. Could you please let
> > > > me know if there is anything missing.
> > >
> > > Fine by me - these patches have had enough review and testing now that
> > > even if anything else did come up, I think it would be better done as
> > > follow-up work on the merged code.
> >
> > Given the ACPICA dependency I believe it is best for this series
> > to go via the ACPI tree, right ?
> >
> > I assume there are all the required ACKs for that to happen.
> 
> The SMMUv3/SMMU related changes (patches 6 - 9) still doesn't have
> explicit ACK from maintainers other than the go ahead above from Robin.
> 
> Just thought of highlighting it as not sure that will be an issue or not.
> 

All,

Just a gentle ping on this series again. Any chance this can make into 5.19?

Please consider.

Thanks,
Shameer

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu























					Reply via email to