On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:45:23PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote: > On 4/29/22 13:23, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 01:06:06PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote: > > > >>> TBH I'd be inclined to just enable DBM unconditionally in > >>> arm_smmu_domain_finalise() if the SMMU supports it. Trying to toggle it > >>> dynamically (especially on a live domain) seems more trouble that it's > >>> worth. > >> > >> Hmmm, but then it would strip userland/VMM from any sort of control > >> (contrary > >> to what we can do on the CPU/KVM side). e.g. the first time you do > >> GET_DIRTY_IOVA it would return all dirtied IOVAs since the beginning > >> of guest time, as opposed to those only after you enabled dirty-tracking. > > > > It just means that on SMMU the start tracking op clears all the dirty > > bits. > > > Hmm, OK. But aren't really picking a poison here? On ARM it's the difference > from switching the setting the DBM bit and put the IOPTE as writeable-clean > (which > is clearing another bit) versus read-and-clear-when-dirty-track-start which > means > we need to re-walk the pagetables to clear one bit.
Yes, I don't think a iopte walk is avoidable? > It's walking over ranges regardless. Also, keep in mind start should always come up in a 0 dirties state on all platforms. So all implementations need to do something to wipe the dirty state, either explicitly during start or restoring all clean during stop. A common use model might be to just destroy the iommu_domain without doing stop so prefering the clearing io page table at stop might be a better overall design. Jason _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
