Remove the pointless check. If an IOMMU is providing transparent DMA API
ops for any device(s) we care about, the DT code will have enforced the
appropriate probe ordering already.

Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
index 247c6ff277ef..2de31746a308 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/component.h>
-#include <linux/iommu.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -239,9 +238,6 @@ static int mtk_drm_kms_init(struct drm_device *drm)
        if (drm_firmware_drivers_only())
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
-               return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
        pdev = of_find_device_by_node(private->mutex_node);
        if (!pdev) {
                dev_err(drm->dev, "Waiting for disp-mutex device %pOF\n",
-- 
2.28.0.dirty

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to