On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 03:17:20PM -0400, Alex Xu (Hello71) wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Hellwig's message of March 30, 2022 2:01 pm:
> > Can you try this patch, which is a bit of a hack?
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> > index 50d209939c66c..61997c2ee0a17 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,8 @@ bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> >      * device does not support DMA to addresses that include the
> >      * encryption mask.
> >      */
> > -   if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) {
> > +   if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) &&
> > +       !get_dma_ops(dev)) {
> >             u64 dma_enc_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(__ffs64(sme_me_mask));
> >             u64 dma_dev_mask = min_not_zero(dev->coherent_dma_mask,
> >                                             dev->bus_dma_limit);
> > 
> 
> This seems to work for me.

Ok, I'll try to come up with a less hacky version and will start a
discussion with the AMD folks that know memory encryption better.
Thanks for the report and testing already!
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to