On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:49:04AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 19:16:14 -0800, Jacob Pan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Fenghua, > > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:02:48 -0800, Fenghua Yu <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > @@ -1047,8 +1040,6 @@ struct iommu_sva *intel_svm_bind(struct device > > > *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void } > > > > > > sva = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm, flags); > > > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sva)) > > > - intel_svm_free_pasid(mm); > > If bind fails, the PASID has no IOMMU nor CPU context. It should be safe > > to free here. > > > Actually, here we cannot tell if the bind is the first of the mm so I think > this is fine. > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <[email protected]>
Thank you very much for your review, Jacob! -Fenghua _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
