On 2021-09-28 23:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Use 2-factor argument form kvcalloc() instead of kvzalloc().

If we have a thing for that now, then sure, why not. FWIW this can't ever overflow due to where "count" comes from, but it has no reason to be special.

Acked-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
index 896bea04c347..18c6edbe5fbf 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static struct page **__iommu_dma_alloc_pages(struct device 
*dev,
        if (!order_mask)
                return NULL;
- pages = kvzalloc(count * sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
+       pages = kvcalloc(count, sizeof(*pages), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!pages)
                return NULL;
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to