Hi,
On 4/23/19 8:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 06:26:06PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
+int iommu_dma_prepare_msi(struct msi_desc *desc, phys_addr_t msi_addr)
{
+ struct device *dev = msi_desc_to_dev(desc);
struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
struct iommu_dma_cookie *cookie;
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!domain || !domain->iova_cookie) {
+ desc->iommu_cookie = NULL;
+ return 0;
+ }
cookie = domain->iova_cookie;
@@ -908,10 +908,33 @@ void iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
* of an MSI from within an IPI handler.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&cookie->msi_lock, flags);
+ desc->iommu_cookie = iommu_dma_get_msi_page(dev, msi_addr, domain);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cookie->msi_lock, flags);
+ return (desc->iommu_cookie) ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
No need for the braces. Also I personally find a:
if (!desc->iommu_cookie)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
much more readable, but that might just be personal preference.
I am happy either way. I will use your suggestion in the next version.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
