On Mar 31, 2026, at 6:04 AM, Tim Düsterhus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > Am 2026-03-30 21:00, schrieb Calvin Buckley: >> I've renamed the INI option per your suggestion. This does invert the >> semantics (matching the one for exceptions), so I took some care when >> editing. I'll update the PR accordingly soon. > > I've checked the diff and noticed that you did not adjust the tie breaker for > the “Default value for error_ignore_args” vote (it still favors `1`). Was > this intentional or an oversight? > > Other than that the RFC looks good to me. Thank you! > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus
I've corrected this.
