> On 21 Nov 2024, at 10:55, Schimkowitsch Robert > <robert.schimkowit...@andritz.com> wrote: > > I’d like to use constexpr more in the future in order to catch UB in > compile-time tests of functions. > Qt has a little constexpr sprinkled here and there, but not a lot. Does > anyone know if there are plans to expand Qt in this direction? > Kind regards > Robert
Hi Robert, It’s generally not an item on the roadmap to make constexpr everything that can be. But when we touch code with expressions that could be constexpr, then we might make that change as a drive-by, if the code would otherwise benefit from it. If there’s any part of Qt where you’d see significant value from making things constexpr, then you’re welcome to push things for review. Cheers, Volker _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
