> That means you should simply verify that your assumption worked That's what the test I am trying to fix is for in the first place, yes. But like I said, it looks like I can just force the registration in place if it's not done yet and then rely on it being available
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 7:56 PM Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On Friday 3 May 2024 09:24:18 GMT-7 NIkolai Marchenko wrote: > > I just need to understand how to properly set up test environment for it. > > You're relying on internal behaviour. That means you should simply verify > that > your assumption worked, before any release of yours with the specific Qt > version that you're compiling with. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
