Thiago, thanks On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, 07:56 Thiago Macieira, <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 July 2023 06:37:20 PDT Yauheni Pervenenka via Interest > wrote: > > Hi, Konstantin, thanks for your reply, I have attached stack when QObject > > created first time, the problem is that UB is already exists in Qt, > > No, it doesn't. > > > Q_CONSTRUCTOR_FUNCTION(initialize) and QBasicAtomicPointer<QThread> > > QCoreApplicationPrivate::theMainThread = > > Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER(nullptr); > > should be called in next order, first should be initialized theMainThread > > and after should be called Q_CONSTRUCTOR_FUNCTION(initialize) but it is > not > > guaranteed by standard, https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/siof > > Nope. The QBasicAtomicPointer is initialised at static time, meaning it is > initialised *before* any code runs. It's guaranteed by the standard. > > Your diagnosis is incorrect. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
