On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 7:10 PM Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>
wrote:

The reason is what I stated: the qt-everywhere package is not as
> well-tested
> as the individual modules that compose it. The modules are tested on a
> daily
> basis by the CI. The everywhere package is not.
>


Yes, I understand what you are saying. But given that `qt-everywhere` is
published even as one of the commercially available packages, I expect it
to be supported (especially: tested) appropriately. I have filed
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-109973.

Thanks,
-- 

      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to