On Tuesday, 7 September 2021 02:52:49 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > Good to hear! > > Part of it comes from CMake generating ninja files instead of Makefiles.
Our qmake-generated Makefiles weren't that slow. Nothing compared to Automake, at least. Qt 5 qtbase/src build: Build succeeded, took 3:01.027s (total run time 3:01.027s), 2388.2% CPU usage Qt 6 equivalent with Ninja: Build succeeded, took 222.01s (2385% CPU usage) 3:01.027 = 181.027s (sorry, different wrapper, so they print time differently) Same compiler, same otherwise-idle machine, icecc disabled. The configuration on both builds is meant to be the same, full build. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
