> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 at 2:07 PM > From: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > To: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > Cc: "Scott Bloom" <sc...@towel42.com>, "Thiago Macieira" > <thiago.macie...@intel.com>, "interest@qt-project.org" > <interest@qt-project.org> > Subject: Re: [Interest] QNetwork classes for submitting google forms > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 at 1:42 PM > > From: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > > To: "Scott Bloom" <sc...@towel42.com> > > Cc: "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>, > > "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > > Subject: Re: [Interest] QNetwork classes for submitting google forms > > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 at 1:12 PM > > > From: "Scott Bloom" <sc...@towel42.com> > > > To: "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com>, > > > "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > > > Subject: Re: [Interest] QNetwork classes for submitting google forms > > > > > > This has come up a couple times for me through the years (essentially > > > make a network request and don’t return until the request has finished). > > > > > > Is there an example anywhere of the "Thiago" (proper.. 😊 ) way to code > > > this? I see this issue in a similar vane to using QThread, when the > > > Trolls/Nokia/TQP (I forget who originally wrote it) wrote up a small but > > > very effective white paper on the proper method of using Qthread, it > > > clarified a ton of questions for many people. > > > > > > > > > You'd probably get feedback that QThread is "too heavy" and for i/o bound > > processes one async event loop is enough. (I've been on the rx end of that) > > > > I think my highest of levels approach is correct: > > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20210602/9366d8ea/attachment-0001.html > > (apologies for the HTML, but my mailer responds by what ever I am replying > > to.) > > > > The one caveat to my code, is if you don't need synchronous requests > > (regrettably, this part of my app requires them) then you can ignore the > > QEventloop stuff, that is leave lines that references `loop` it out, and > > you'll have a fully async inline lambda. > > > > You however are asking for a synchronous and this I think is the best way. > > Feel free to assault the code, (Thiago and others.) I would like Qt to > > adopt some kind of this pattern. > > I cleaned this up a bit:
https://gist.github.com/jhihn/19a4f03eeae473f3083dcecb4e25ad59 _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
