On Dienstag, 8. Juni 2021 23:47:50 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday, 8 June 2021 13:57:53 PDT Jason H wrote: > > Which is neiher what I acually had but performs the same bad conversion as > > what I had. I am not sure why the QVariantList vs QList have different > > fidelity - the one with more fidelity - QList - actually has has less > > specificity. > > Because that's how C++ works. > > QList is not a type, it's a template. Neither QVariant nor QJsonDocument can > know all possible QList instantiations. So they have coded only a few > (QVariantList and QStringList only, possibly QVector<QVariant> and > QVector<QString> in Qt 5 too, I don't remember).
I guess our system could detect QList<QVariant> as QVariantList and QList<QString> as QStringList. They should be binary identical anyway. Best regards Allan _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
