> On 3/26/21 1:39 PM, Jason H wrote: > > Thiago, apparently, even with a commercial license, we no longer have rights > > to use whatever versions were current when we had the license. Previously, > > we could use > > it in perpetuity. This is probably a deal breaker at my new organization. > > It is my > > understanding that after our software development is done, we have to > > maintain > > commercial licenses even when we are not_developing_ software in Qt. I > > think the previous > > perpetuity licensing was appropriate. > > **Seriously** > > They are trying to end a 5.x perpetuity license that was already bought > and paid for? Nah. Can't be. I know a customer that paid north of $600K > for such a license and the device isn't yet out the door. They happen to > have a lot of lawyers too. I can't believe they would take that lying down.
They can't just change your contract/license. > What I "thought" was said was you could no longer obtain such a license. > I don't agree with that, but that policy doesn't place QtC in legal > jepordy because the license change only impacts new product. This is correct, there is no more perpetuity license. This will likely be a sticking point for the company I am currently at. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
