On 3/24/21 8:45 AM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
The research done by e.g. DORA around continuous deployment, including in
safety critical environments, tells a different story than your anecdotes.
https://www.devops-research.com/research.html
You cannot continuously deploy to a medical device that has to go
through clinical trial. They have to go through clinical trials because
*even one crash kills*
To be honest, many of those bugs are really hard to fix without breaking
anything else, so often we decide that a known, well-documented bug is
preferable to a bunch of new, unknown bugs that a fix might introduce.
You knowingly create 30 year old security issues and you diss your customers
who have worked around theirs.
:P
Knowingly? That’s a bit much, even from you, Roland.
Well, you are the one who said "so often we decied that a known,
well-documented bug is preferable" which means you are knowingly leaving
a bug in the product that could become a security/stability
vulnerability (if it wasn't to start with.) As to the number of years,
that is just the march of time.
You forgot customer abandonment
Talk to your sales rep.
OpenSource users never want to hear from a sales rep.
Qt 6 being useless
QML needing to be ripped out.
Don’t use it.
I don’t consider this substance. Go back to the original thread if you want to
spread FUD, Roland.
It's not FUD when LTS was shot out of the saddle and Qt 6 is unusable.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
