> Raise your hands.
> 
> How many of you have reported bugs that have sat open for over a year?

A year? LOL. 1 year is the age of the newest unresolved issue I have. Most of 
them are
many years old, including multiple issues dated 2012.

> Raise your hands.
> 
> How many of you have bugs reported against earlier versions of Qt that sat 
> open until
> they were closed as being against an unsupported version?

Actually this did not happen to me as far as I can remember. LOL! Probably 
because most of
my unresolved issue are rotting in the issue tracker as "Reported" and are 
ignored
forever.

> How many of you have had to scrap products or features because bugs you 
> reported were
> blockers and they were just rotting in the bug database? How many of those 
> bugs are
> still rotting?

Not scraped anything. But rewritten a lot. Hunted long known bugs. Reinvented 
the wheel
and wrote horrible work arounds.

> The only thing that is going to work for the big ticket companies is a 100% 
> commercial
> product that happens to release its older stuff as OpenSource and sometimes 
> accepts
> software developed by others for free. Nobody wants to hear that, but that is 
> the only
> model that works. With that model comes fixing all bugs inside 90 days. None 
> of this
> hoping someone in the OpenSource community fixes it for free.

You are right. But that has nothing to do with "Open Source" in the first 
place. I have
seen larger companies that insisted in "Open Source" for critical components - 
still with
the full, the reliably commercial support you are talking about. I think you 
are mixing
"Open Source" and "Community driven" here.

> That QML stuff really has to be ripped out and put into its own commercial 
> package so
> the rest of the world doesn't have to pay the heavy price. 

+1

> The Wolfe oven needed a stacked widget, not a state machine. Project craters 
> like these
> aren't helping the reputation of Qt.

Can you explain that? I have seen software going down the drain because people 
didn't use
state machines. I have seen software using state machines without urgend need. 
But I have
never seen a software that failed *due to* using state machines (at least not 
when fully
understood).

> Roughly half of my bugs reported via the forum are fixed within a couple of 
> days.

Seriously? Wow. What kind of bugs? What impact?

> Phones only care about what is shipping next week.
> As I said before, those are diametrically opposed markets.

I agree?

> Just my 0.0002 cents.

How do to change that? LOL, SCNR

-- 
Best Regards,
Bernhard Lindner

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to