Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hello Roland, Qt devs! On 3/22/21 12:38 PM, Roland Hughes
wrote: >> Even if TQC took back their critical decisions, I can't imagine
that people would ever >> trust them again. This could cause fatal damage
to Qt in the long [...]
Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 4.6 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[178.71.128.94 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A)
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Roland, Qt devs!
On 3/22/21 12:38 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
Even if TQC took back their critical decisions, I can't imagine that people
would ever
trust them again. This could cause fatal damage to Qt in the long run if they
don't sell
it to someone more responsible.
Dude,
Comcast, TimeWarner, and all of those other set-top box vendors formed
an OpenSource project to create RDK so they could kick Qt to the curb.
They aren't coming back.
Opera moved to RDK.
Doubtful they would ever come back.
Although all of this sounds great, but is the RDK a real alternative to
Qt on desktops?
Is there something like QtWidgets module? For X11?
If there is one, are there small examples for RDK features, so that one
can compare RDK and Qt side-by-side?
Vad
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
