On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 00:41, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Roland Hughes <rol...@logikalsolutions.com> > wrote: > > > On 3/17/21 6:00 AM, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > >> Out of curiosity: what alternatives are people settling on? > > > > > Forgot to mention. Comcast dumped Qt in favor of Webkit some time late > > last year. You probably were on the SPAM and phone call list. We all > > know just how technical the people pimps put on the phone are, but here > > is what they told me. > > > > FUD + death-of-perpetual-license = abandon-Qt > > FUD from Qt + FUD from Roland = people getting tired > > I'm tired, and looking every single day how to get rid of Qt. > I'm not happy about the situation, but it forces me to rethink. > > My main grief is that Qt doesn't seem to care about C++. > What was their last contribution to the standard? > > One day, C++ will have introspection, and it will come from boost, not Qt... > So sad!
Tip to whoever: Qt = Atlassian. Expensive stuff for big companies that think you can buy success. Chris _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
