20.10.2020, 18:12, "Benjamin TERRIER" <b.terr...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 20:54, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: >> There's some license shenanegans going on. >> https://www.qt.io/blog/change-in-open-source-licensing-of-qt-wayland-compositor-qt-application-manager-and-qt-pdf >> However there was a later update: >> https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2020-January/038457.html >> >> So I don't know why it was not included. >> It seems that some people (myself included) objected to commericalizing a >> module that was based on a open source engine to start with. > > Yes, I've seen the discussions about the license, but I thought it was solved. > > Given that The Qt Company is selling the QtPdf module under a commercial > license on the marketplace I was thinking that > they remove the QtPdf artefacts from the QtWebEngine packages. That would > make sense for commercial users. > > However, for open source users it looks like a bug in the installer.
Isn't this done intentionally to promote commercial licenses among open source users? -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
