On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 19:28, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Interest <interest@qt-project.org> wrote: > > Il 04/12/19 02:36, Christian Gagneraud ha scritto: > > BTW, Clazy has a check for that very specific case, which just show > > how dangerous is this QStringBuilder. > > https://github.com/KDE/clazy/blob/master/docs/checks/README-auto-unexpected-qstringbuilder.md > > As a professional developer, one should strive for keeping a codebase > under clazy, clang-tidy, and friends; and always be under -Werror.
Really? (sarcasm) There's what you wish, and there's what you're asked (or allowed) to do. Another set of orthogonal concepts... We don't seem to live in the same world. > There are no excuses for not fixing mistakes that tooling can detect. Stop being patronising please. You're not helping. > Kudos to Sérgio, I agree, and kudos to contributors too. PS: Yes, static analysers and code instrumentation are good, and we should all embrace them, but your email didn't help the community in any way. Blaming people without context knowledge is actually counter productive. Chris. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
