Why not declare a signals into your singleton header and call it directly?
MySingleton.h
class MySingleton
{
signals:
void MySignals();
};
myOtherCode.cpp
Q_EMIT MySingleton::Instance()->MySignals();
-----Original Message-----
From: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Jason H
Sent: November 13, 2019 11:28 AM
To: interestqt-project.org <interest@qt-project.org>
Subject: [Interest] Most simple emit from singleton?
I've stumbled across a paradigm that I am starting to use frequently where I
have a singleton, and I want it to emit something when I tell it to.
So I've been providing a function and doing:
MySingleton::instance()->emitMySignal();
Where:
void MySingleton::emitMySignal() {
emit mySignal();
}
But this seems "silly". Is there a better way to do this? Ideally I'd like to
skip creating the function and do something like:
MySingleton::instance()->emit MySignal(); or emit
MySingleton::instance()->MySignal();
There may still be a better way?
Thoughts?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
