+1

> On Oct 17, 2019, at 6:42 AM, d3fault <d3faultdot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 10/16/19, Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@qt.io> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As it turned out, there was some miscommunication that happened regarding
>> the re-licensing of Qt PDF, and not all contributors were on board regarding
>> the license change. That means we’re not changing the modules license and
>> won’t be adding it to become a supported part of Qt until this has been
>> sorted out.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>> 
> 
> This is excellent news. I hope those contributors continue to resist
> the change to GPLv3. As a developer who releases his code under an
> LGPLv3-like license, all of Qt's GPLv3/Commercial modules are useless
> to me.
> 
> d3fault
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest@qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to