My config.log did not contain the string “std-atomic64.” It did report that it could not find libatomic. Deleting config.cache and running config.status worked though!
So how do you account for that? Seems very odd to me. This was from a freshly extracted qt source archive. > On Jun 21, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > On Friday, 21 June 2019 10:35:36 PDT Patrick Stinson wrote: >> #define QT_FEATURE_std_atomic64 -1 > > Can you check the config.log in the top-level dir to see what how the std- > atomic64 test failed? If you don't see that in the config.log, remove > config.cache and rerun configure (./config.status) > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel System Software Products > > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
