On 5/14/19 5:00 AM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2019 09:02:34 PDT Roland Hughes wrote:
You can add methods which allow for good software engineering. For
everyone of the existing hacks you can add a "u" version which returns
an unsigned value and on failure a 0 while setting the failure bool.
Won't do. That's a final decision.
Okay. Be aware that at some point a chicken like these will come home to
roost.
https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/medtronic-minimed-wrongful-death-lawsuit-141763/
https://www.cssfirm.com/2011/03/11/fentanyl-overdose-from-defective-pain-pump/
Never worked on those. Never worked for that client. Have worked with
quite a few people who've worked on projects for them and they use quite
a bit of Qt.
Treating signed values as unsigned can be fatal.
I'm done making the case now.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593 (cell)
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
