ср, 24 апр. 2019 г. в 22:08, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru>:
>
>
>
> 24.04.2019, 22:01, "Alexander Ivash" <elder...@gmail.com>:
> > What I really need is some 'plugin' to qmake which would allow to
> > modify qml files on the fly before placing it into resources (but not
> > touching them on filesystem!). In ideal world, yeah.
>
> That's possible to do with qmake already, but you'll have to build
> resource files manually via custom targets
>
> >
> > ср, 24 апр. 2019 г. в 21:51, Alexander Ivash <elder...@gmail.com>:
> >>  2Jerome:
> >>
> >>  The issue is that even if that function will be doing nothing, logging
> >>  data (which might be sensitive) can be captured via hooks / dump
> >>  analysis etc. I really need to pre-processes to eliminate not only
> >>  function call but also function parameters completely. Think about
> >>  this scenario:
> >>
> >>  console.debug('password: ',
> >>  someFunctionWhichReturnsPasswordFromProtectedStorage());
>
> You can wrap this whole expression into function and replace that
> function with empty one:
>
> function printPasswordToDebug() {
>   console.debug('password: ', 
> someFunctionWhichReturnsPasswordFromProtectedStorage());
> }
>
> and replace printPasswordToDebug
>
> >>
> >>  In this case even if console.debug will be replaced with empty
> >>  function, 'someFunctionWhichReturnsPasswordFromProtectedStorage()'
> >>  will be executed anyway and as the result password will appear
> >>  somewhere in JS heap so after capturing dump it will be simpler to
> >>  find it.
> >>
> >>  2Tomasz:
> >>
> >>  In fact I would love to use logging category, but only for debug
> >>  builds. But I have some requirements to minimize risk of sensitive
> >>  data leak via logging. And to make a life of reverse engineers a bit
> >>  more complicated if you like. So ideally no logging-related functions
> >>  (and their parameters too!) should be visible in release build.
> >>
> >>  ср, 24 апр. 2019 г. в 21:27, Jérôme Godbout <godbo...@amotus.ca>:
> >>  >
> >>  > Maybe you can overload the functor directly into the code and import 
> >> the file only if in debug mode (optional module):
> >>  > http://udidu.blogspot.com/2012/12/override-console-functions.html
> >>  >
> >>  > That could also be helpful to split the log into multiple receiver.
> >>  >
> >>  > Not sure if this would work, but maybe you can override the console.log 
> >> command into the QQmlScriptEngine and define a new javascript function 
> >> that does nothing. Maybe into the your main.cpp where you create the 
> >> QQmlEngine you can call the rootContext() QQmlContext object, maybe you 
> >> can extract the console object with QVariant contextProperty() and set the 
> >> debug() property of it with a QQmlExpression, I cannot glue all this 
> >> together, but maybe something into that direction could be done before you 
> >> start loading the main qml file. This is far fetched by might work but it 
> >> seem overcomplicated to me.
> >>  >
> >>  > -----Original Message-----
> >>  > From: Interest <interest-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Alexander 
> >> Ivash
> >>  > Sent: April 24, 2019 12:56 PM
> >>  > To: interestqt-project.org <interest@qt-project.org>
> >>  > Subject: [Interest] QML preprocessing
> >>  >
> >>  > I understand that this topic was raised a lot of times and that this is 
> >> not QML-way. But, what options do I have in case of requirements to 
> >> eliminate all the logging for release builds?
> >>  >
> >>  > Is there any hidden magic in qmake, like 'QMAKE_SUBSTITUTES' but more 
> >> flexible to substitute all the 'console.debug....' with '// console.debug' 
> >> right before adding qml into resources?
> >>  >
> >>  > p.s. Yea, I'm aware of selectors, but would like to avoid having both 
> >> component-with-logging.qml and component-with-no-logging.qml
> >>  >
> >>  > Regards, Alexander
> >>  > _______________________________________________
> >>  > Interest mailing list
> >>  > Interest@qt-project.org
> >>  > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest@qt-project.org
> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to