Hi, I have never heard about Conan.io before. Thanks for the tip!
Need to explore! Best, Nuno > On 17 Apr 2019, at 08:06, rollas...@gmail.com wrote: > > Actually Conan (conan.io) is quite nice for these things once you manage to > setup a cross-build environment correctly. Normally this is quite straight > forward. In Android, it also is except for those moments in which there are > changes in the NDK (removing gcc, upgrading this, deprecating that, changing > the layout, etc) for which both Conan and CMake have to align to and, > especially Conan, lags a bit. Changing from NDK r18 to NDK r19 was quite > painful for me. Many things are changing from NDK r18. But at some point a > Docker image with support for this was released that supports this. > > With Conan, you just ask the 3rd parties you need and it will install/build > them and even set up the .pro file (via an include of a conanbuildinfo.pri) > for the os/compiler/configuration/runtime you want each time, provided there > is a recipe (a Python script to download, build and package) for them. Many > standard libs (as OpenSSL) have recipes already prepared for you in the > builtin public repositories. And you can always make yours when they don't > exist yet (or find them in GitHub). Then you can even include them in your > library via the Artifactory version suited for this so that you build them > once, publish them, and then conan first tries to fetch them. > > For instance these are the ones I did build myself in case you prefer taking > them already built > > OpenSSL 1.1.1a for Android/armv7/clang8/Release (ndk r19) > https://tools.iconiqlabs.com/artifactory/conan-local/conan/OpenSSL/1.1.1a/stable/package/0d5d27f219d797566f5bac2a5a6e0f97ba03056d/conan_package.tgz > > OpenSSL 1.1.1a for Android/armv8/clang8/Release (ndk r19) > https://tools.iconiqlabs.com/artifactory/conan-local/conan/OpenSSL/1.1.1a/stable/package/2f9e64b2f81be1a1452a2d9ab30d41d21bae9bd8/conan_package.tgz > > I verified the one built for armv7 works. I used to build libssh2 against it > and I am using it at a daily basis. The one for armv8 should just work as > well, but I haven't tried it because none of my devices has that such > processor. > > Regards. > > On 15/04/2019 20:41, Nuno Santos wrote: >> Thiago, >> >> Thanks for your insights. >> >> I usually tend to postpone this updates because of the time I need to invest >> in rebuilding the libs. >> >> I always end up stumbling in some weird building problem… >> >> Does anyone knows what’s the quickest way of building OpenSSL for Android? >> >> Best, >> >> Nuno >> >>> On 15 Apr 2019, at 19:30, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, 15 April 2019 11:12:44 PDT Nuno Santos wrote: >>>> I’m providing OpenSSL 1.0.1s as an ANDROID_EXTRA_LIBS param. >>>> >>>> Does anybody know if the problem here is the fact that OpenSSL is too old? >>> Yes, the problem is OpenSSL's age. Yours is apparently too old to support >>> DTLS >>> 1.2 (and apparently DTLS at all). >>> >>> In any case, for OpenSSL, *ANY* version except the very latest[*] is too >>> old. >>> Upgrade now. And next month. And the one after that. Ad aeternam. >>> >>> [*] latest of 1.0.x or of 1.1.x, since 1.0.x is still supported until Dec 31 >>> of this year. >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >>> Software Architect - Intel System Software Products >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Interest mailing list >>> Interest@qt-project.org >>> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
