Spam detection software, running on the system "mx.qt-project.org",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Hi, I am new to Qt. Yesterday, I have learned about: -
QNetworkAccessManager
- QNetworkRequest - QNetworkReply (as I wanted to figure out how to make
HTTP GET/POST request and process the responses). [...]
Content analysis details: (4.7 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: qt.io]
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.7 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail)
1.0 FROM_EXCESS_BASE64 From: base64 encoded unnecessarily
1.2 KHOP_DYNAMIC Relay looks like a dynamic address
1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I am new to Qt.
Yesterday, I have learned about:
- QNetworkAccessManager
- QNetworkRequest
- QNetworkReply
(as I wanted to figure out how to make HTTP GET/POST request and process the
responses).
Here:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qnetworkaccessmanager.html#details
I read:
One QNetworkAccessManager instance should be enough for the whole Qt
application.
I do not understand what do I gain by that.
Our application makes different HTTP requests.
Each response must be handled differently.
Why would we want to pipe all "finished" signals (generated by the
QNetworkAccessManager) to the same set of slots?
What sense would that make?
---
Curiously,
Matej
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
