I'm with Jason here. I use Qt for mobile development as well, and I don't think a ban is the right course of action. Choice of words is a pre-eminent selector in deciding which posts to take seriously. Using terms in the the manner Roland does about phone development, in all likelihood, self-disqualifies any serious consideration his posts might have received otherwise. Although a shame, that is repercussion enough in my opinion.
/René On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 15:07 Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > The truth is I often enjoy the hyperbole. In my book it's better to have a > thick skin rather than to go around being offended by everyone and asking > for them to comply with a fragile nature. However this most recent post put > down the Qt mobile community of which I am a significant member having been > using Qt in mobile for about the past 5 years. I have argued repeatedly for > more attention in the Mobile platforms (except WinRT) and the message was > directly contrary to that aim. I pointed out (off list) ironically what > should happen is port the application to mobile and just let Samsung make > and revise the hardware faster than he ever could. Didn't draw any ire but > it didn't go anywhere either. I'm starting to wonder if the hyperbole isn't > for comedic effect. > > My plan of action is that I'm just going to ignore this person's snarky > posts which comes with the price that I might have the answer to their > issue and I won't contribute it. > > I on occasion post something snarky because I am frustrated with the > problem I'm having. I wouldn't want to be banned over it. There is a social > capital here, add I try to have a positive balance. And I think it's > reasonable that when you fall below zero, you stop getting replies. I would > not bring in the CoC just yet. > > > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2019 at 8:18 PM > > From: "Konstantin Shegunov" <kshegu...@gmail.com> > > To: m...@herrdiel.de > > Cc: "Interests Qt" <interest@qt-project.org> > > Subject: Re: [Interest] Netiquette [was: Feature Request - QtCreator - > Multiple right margins] > > > > > > > > [...] > > > I do appreciate the open discussion style on this list. I even do > > > appreciate a somewhat harsh style, if it has a factual base and is > > > getting straight to the point instead of b*s*ing around. But those > > > lengthy wallpapers our President of Logikal solutions commonly utters, > > > have long since crossed the border from amusing to annoying. > > > > > > > I, myself, still perceive them more as amusingly misguided, than really > > angering (annoying at times, yes). This is just me, though, I have > > experience with that kind of thing. However, I can very well imagine how > > you, and most certainly others, are finding them taxing; not surprising > at > > all. > > Plus, as I rule, I tend to discard anything that references fortran or > > cobol as examples of anything ... ;) > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
