Faster Cheaper Splat started in 1992.

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/jplhistory/the90/

Your list had only 1 NASA "bug" prior to that in 1962.

I don't remember if the 1996 prototype rocket explosion was NASA itself or a third party supplier like the Challenger booster rocket.

After NASA went AGILE, you can see how the list ballooned despite smaller budget and fewer missions. Hence the industry rebranding the strategy faster-cheaper-splat in honor of the Mars polar lander where automated unit tests, just there to check a box like all AGILE development, tested one component using metric values and the other SAE yet the 2 had to communicate. This entry in wikipedia is incorrect.

-----

NASA Mars Polar Lander <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Polar_Lander> was destroyed because its flight software mistook vibrations due to atmospheric turbulence for evidence that the vehicle had landed and shut off the engines 40 meters from the Martian surface (December 3, 1999).^[11] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_bugs#cite_note-11>

----

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/

"We're going to look at how was the data transferred," Gavin said. "How did it originally get into system in English units? How was it transferred? When we were doing navigation and Doppler (distance and speed) checks, how come we didn't find it?"


AGILE is how they didn't find it. Every increase in speed comes with the price of a dramatic decrease in safety and quality.


On 1/9/19 4:00 AM, alexander golks wrote:
Am Tue, 8 Jan 2019 06:15:08 -0600
schrieb Roland Hughes<rol...@logikalsolutions.com>:

only NASA pre-faster-cheaper-splat days had more rigorous development
rules and physical testing
yes, indeed;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_bugs

--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593  (cell)
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to