Waitman,
The one I had personal experience with was OpenVMS. Microsoft been
paying owners of that OS boo-coo bucks to kill it off for years. Killing
it off means going to prison though and Microsoft isn't willing to pay
that price. HP did find a loophole though, you could fire all of the
core developers and just let the OS coast, so that is what they did.
Tandem c89
https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c02128447
some mention of possible c11
https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c02128447
but COBOL only goes to COBOL85 so C11 can't be complete
https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c02128447
Unisys appears to be in same boat.
https://public.support.unisys.com/2200/docs/cp16.0/pdf/78310422-012.pdf
UCS C is written in accordance with the specifications of the American
National
Standards Institute, Inc. in American National Standard for Information
Systems
Programming Language C, X3.159-1989
Basically any of the older platforms which were used in the high volume
high availability severe security financial worlds. The vendors may have
went away, but the platforms didn't. Don't be surprised to find
financial institutions still running on Prime computers. Once a
proprietary system gets past a certain age, it gains in security rather
than loses. It becomes less and less compatible with everything else
making a breach harder and harder.
They don't "need" remote logging. New regulations to combat identity
theft by making financial institutions far more liable for breaches
force remote logging on them. Various "monitoring" services now exist.
They only accept the latest syslog message "standard" RFC5424. I assume
that is because it is one guy with a cast-off Pentium computer running
some free Linux distro having gotten a direct domain for their spare
bedroom/basement.
Not just system level errors, but application, failed password,
everything must be routed. Most of the older OS don't have a central
error logging system, but, rather, things are split off because
different groups would be responsible for them.
These outside services are just there to check a "do not go to prison"
box. I've yet to hear about any of them actually detecting and stopping
a breach. I've also not heard of any breach cases involving a third
party monitor going to court to see how the finger pointing played out.
On 12/23/2018 4:00 AM, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Dec 22, 2018, 1:05 PM, Roland Hughes wrote:
[snip]
Try porting it to a non-Linux platform where the C compiler only goes up
to the first half of C99.
[/snip]
Only Curious.. example of platform that is not Linux and only has 'first half
of C99' (and needs remote logging too, i suppose) ?
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
