Should have done this a long time ago...
https://i.imgur.com/HmnchHN.png
So long and thanks for all the fish __
On 12/22/18, 9:53 AM, "Interest on behalf of Roland Hughes"
<interest-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of rol...@logikalsolutions.com>
wrote:
On 12/21/2018 4:37 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 21.12.2018, 19:42, "Vlad Stelmahovsky"<vladstelmahov...@gmail.com>:
>> Nope, its only my guess based on short Dart code checking and some
articles, how it works
>>
>> Google definitely aware about Qt, but its huge, so..
> Note that declarative UI description languages were known long before
QML, even Motif had a couple of them
They predate C++. They predate DOS and the x86 architecture. They
existed during CP/M. DBASE II provided a scripted UI language which was
interpreted at run time. Even found an example on-line.
http://tedleath.com/samples/dbase.htm
So did RBASE and every other RAD (Rapid Application Development) tool.
The primary difference between first generation interpreted UI languages
and QML is the early ones required a licensed version of the interpreter
be previously installed on the target. With QML applications the engines
are bundled in.
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
