On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 07:45:58AM +0000, Mitch Curtis wrote: > We have #necessitas for Android discussion,
Right. > and I remember #qtforandroid was recently created after the spam > attacks. Today I learned we also have #qt-android. #qt-android has been the hideout during the spam attack. I was not aware of #qtforandroid until today. > Can we please settle on one channel [...] * Channel #necessitas modes: +cnt * Channel #necessitas created on Wed Apr 27 06:39:36 2011 20 users * Channel #qt-android modes: +ns * Channel #qt-android created on Thu Aug 17 06:42:20 2017 16 users * Channel #qtforandroid modes: +cnrt * Channel #qtforandroid created on Fri Aug 31 09:15:36 2018 1 user #necessitas wins by age, population and openness. A potential problem there is the lack of an operator as seen during the attack, in which case #qt-android is a reasonable alternative to keep around. > and I'll add it to the Wiki [1]? > People looking for help don't benefit from having three fragmented > channels for discussion. > > [1] https://wiki.qt.io/Online_Communities There was no fragmentation this morning. #necessitas was the only channel listed in the wiki. Someone added #qtforandroid in the mean time, which now has been replaced by a recommendation to use #qt-android. Andre' _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
