On 9/30/18 5:27 PM, interest-requ...@qt-project.org wrote:
I'm returning there for a few months to participate in a re-evaluation
process. They are considering ditching Qt for Electron. Doing side by
side development on all platforms to see which works best for them.
When we stumble into one of those features we need which doesn't exist
on all platforms, there won't be any way I can continue making a case
for Qt.
Qt is far more superior over Electron in any sense except only one:
developer in Qt must be more skilled than common html/css/js developer
due to tight links to C++
So, your customer does not choose between "good" and "bad" tech. It's
just a question of HR and TTM
Actually they are choosing between tech. There is very little
development happening. Just creating a browser based/type application
which serves up local content without Internet access. Must run on
massive number of platforms. Once deployed the content can be changed
out at will but the application does not change. The locally running app
needs to do things most of today's browsers won't allow. Things Electron
claims to provide (not tried yet)
--
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630) 205-1593
http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net
http://www.johnsmith-book.com
http://www.logikalblog.com
http://www.interestingauthors.com/blog
http://lesedi.us
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
