Good reference. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Interest <interest-bounces+kim.hartman=tenasys....@qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 12:15 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 23:53:17 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote: > Hi Kim, > > Even partial Posix will help you get going. It is possible to do > without, but then more work will be needed. I echo the part about POSIX. If you don't have a POSIX layer, you're going to have to port even things like filesystem support, so it's going to increase your workload considerably. We don't require full POSIX, much less POSIX certification. Just look at Android: their C library (Bionic) is a very crappy implementation of the POSIX specification, but it's sufficient for Qt needs. But the better your implementation is, the less you'll see me complain. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
