On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 17:25, ekke <e...@ekkes-corner.org> wrote: > Am 07.08.18 um 15:52 schrieb Mike Krus via Interest: > > It was already addressed in my post. It seems to satisfy LGPL requirements on > your part, but not on Apple's part (because they don't allow the re-linked > application to run due to their DRM.) > > given all the appropriate project setup and compiled object code (.o, .a, > even shared lib files), a user signed up to the free Apple Developer should > in theory be able to link another version of Qt into a final executable, > codesign it and run it on his device. Would be a real pain to setup and > maintain though. > > > yes - this should be possible - found a good description: > https://stackoverflow.com/a/39438539 > > but not every customer likes to publish the APK or iOS object files > outside the stores ;-) > > it's reallly not easy to motivate other mobile app devs to switch over to > Qt with high license fees or complicated rules to satisfy LGPL > > having a 25 EUR Independent app developer license would be better ;-) >
100% agree, for startup and independant developer. We don’t even think at this price and it contributes to the development of Qt.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
