On 1 August 2018 at 00:09, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 July 2018 at 23:55, Kai Koehne <kai.koe...@qt.io> wrote: >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Interest <interest-bounces+kai.koehne=qt...@qt-project.org> On Behalf >>> Of Christian Gagneraud >>> [...] >>> >> We used to build Qt-5.6.3 on and for Linux-i386. >>> >> I recently had to downgrade to Qt-5.6.0 [...] >> >>> I don't want to be mean or rude, but honestly i have notice a degradation of >>> patch release management in the recent years... >>> To the point that now the "Qt Maintenance Tool" offers you to install >>> different >>> patch release, like nobody trust they are actually equivalent and ABI >>> backward >>> compatible as they used to be... >> >> Criticizing the MaintenanceTool to (again) provide non-latest patch level >> releases in a thread you started with "I recently had to downgrade to Qt >> 5.6.0' is ... interesting 😉 > > It is indeed! ;) > The core problem, is that you have dropped Linux32 for both open > source and commercial users. > > Unfortunately the code base i'm dealing with cannot run on 64 bits > machine (both runtime and build time). > We need to run Qt 5.6 on: > - Windows/intel 32 bits > - Linux/intel 32 bits > - Linux/arm 32 bits > > We need to build Qt and Qt apps on: > - Windows/intel 32 bits > - Linux/intel 32 bits > > And building Qt for Linux 32 is a real pain. > Why don't you provide QQuickCompiler for Linux32 to your paid customers?
Just to be clear: I cannot build QQuickCompiler for Linux32-qt5.6 myself, b/c AFAIK, source code is not available to us, although we're a paid customer. Going a bit further, correct me if i'm wrong, but QuickCompiler is no secret anymore, hasn't it be source-released with Qt 5.9 or 5.12? Chris _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
