Am 28.05.18 um 11:25 schrieb Christoph Keller: > > You are correct, in my opinion the price for Qt is way too high if you > only need the mobile platforms. > that's right there should be a 30$ or so per Dev per month license for mobile platforms really don't understand why Qt isn't pushing mobile Apps with a cheap Indie Developer License > > That's the reason we're thinking about phasing out Qt in the next project. > sorry to hear Qt is so GREAT on mobile platforms w QQC2 > > You'll likely reach the $100k revenue with a 2-man project soon. > yep - with 2 or more devs you'll reach the limits soon
I'm a single developer working from my home office and it works for me with StartUp License @Sylvain: if you fit into the 100.000$ maximum I recommend to fill out the formular and wait for answer from sales. I'm pretty sure you'll get the license. I'm using this license with 99 $ / month and know that there are some otherd evs out there using this license > > Don't forget there's also Google's Flutter in the game which is > written in dart and renders all by itself like Qt does. > Flutter does a great work and is pushed by Google. but: try to develop a x-platform project with Camera, BluetoothLE, ... and compare with Qt ;-) > > React Native will give you all the joy of dependency management > (cocoapods, gradle) and 3rdparty libraries available for mobile which > will be hell to integrate with Qt (think of lottie animations and > google maps for example). Also they support the nice "hot reload" > (flutter also has this feature). > > Regards, > Christoph > > > On 27.05.18 10:13, Sylvain Pointeau wrote: >> Hello Ekke, Jason, Jérôme, and all >> >> Thank you so much for sharing your experience and tips. >> >> Did you use the v-play components? how did you succeed to match the >> native look and feel? >> >> My choice is between Qt and React Native. >> >> I would have gone with Qt but the price is the real barrier for me. >> As I don't know the success of the app, it is hard to start (and >> convince my partners) knowing the price to pay per year. >> >> Ekke you mention in your blog about the startup plan but as far as I >> know, this is discontinued, the startup plan now let you use the >> "trial" version until you go to the store. >> >> React Native is fully in javascript, but seems typescript can be used >> (which is much better) (BTW would be great to use typescript in QML). >> >> The benefit of RN is IMO to do json natively, but the negative aspect >> is that it is not as cross plateform as Qt, so the desktop version is >> likely to be (much) more challenging. >> >> I am really puzzled, I think that Qt is better than RN, but the price ... >> >> Am I missing something? is there someone else in the same situation? >> >> ps: I continue to investigate (and to read the blog of Ekke), my >> choice is not done yet. >> >> Best regards, >> Sylvain >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
