On Tuesday, 22 May 2018 14:35:28 -03 Jason H wrote: > Like screens, input methods, windows, sessions, clipboards, font, palettes, > etc. Maybe these things are lighter weight than I think they are > (particularly for the "offscreen" plugin )
You may be right that this is unneeded weight for the command-line applications that show no GUI and yet still need some painting primitives. But we're not going to spend a lot of effort splitting the library. Those applications are a minority in the Qt world and they are served by QtGui as- is. The effort of splitting plus the drawbacks in having a library boundary are most likely bigger than the gain in having smaller libraries. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
