Am Tue, 24 Apr 2018 08:52:53 -0700 schrieb Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> On Tuesday, 24 April 2018 07:39:08 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > 24.04.2018, 11:40, "Vadim Peretokin" <vpereto...@gmail.com>: > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:14 AM Thiago Macieira > <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > > >> On Monday, 23 April 2018 22:02:20 PDT Vadim Peretokin wrote: > > >>> > Correct, QBuffer is not optimised for speed. I ran into that while > > >>> > developing > > >>> > QCborStreamWriter. The solution was to bypass it for speed. > > >>> > > >>> OK, that's a pity. I'll look into using pugixml instead, and if anyone > > >>> else > > >>> knows a faster XML serializer, I'd he happy to hear about it. > > >> > > >> Any chance you can choose a different serialisation format? > > > > > > We're thinking on the consequences of that - if pugixml isn't fast enough > > > still, will look at a different format. Recommendations welcome! :) > > If your serialized data is intended to be read by Qt applications only, > > QDataStream may be a good choice > > Also slow. > > Binary QJsonDocument is the fastest, followed closely by QCborValue (new in > 5.12). > when using QJsonDocument you may/should pay attention to QtQTBUG-47629: QJsonObject size maximum length 128MB https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-47629 -- /* */* Only Sun can take such nice parts and fuck up the programming interface * * like this. Good job guys... * *\/ * linux-2.6.6/drivers/net/sunhme.c */ _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
