Thanks all for your thoughts. Assuming that it throws bad_alloc exception, I added global replacement of new operator but it throws linker error of multiple definition of new operator though it seems to invoke overloaded version of new operator with filename and line no.Any pointers on how to avoid ld error?
On Thursday, March 1, 2018, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > 01.03.2018, 20:35, "Ramakanth Kesireddy" <rama.k...@gmail.com>: >> When system runs on low memory, the object allocations through new in the Qt application does throw bad_alloc exception,right? > > It may or may not throw exception, depending on OS kind, overcommit settings, > memory limits set for your application, and your luck. > >> >> On Thursday, March 1, 2018, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 15:23:22 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>>> bad_alloc is mostly thrown due to too view memory for the request in >>>> question. >>>> > so when you continue your program, chances are good to see more >>>> > bad_allocs. >>>> >>>> Or don't get any bad_alloc at all, being killed by OOM Killer promptly >>> >>> You get bad_alloc when you make silly requests, like negative sizes or >>> petabytes. >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >>> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Interest mailing list >>> Interest@qt-project.org >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >>> , >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
