On 7 January 2018 at 06:02, Christian Gagneraud <chg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 January 2018 at 10:18, René J. V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Christian Gagneraud wrote: >> >>>> Uh... why do we provide a 32-bit installer in the first place, if we don't >>>> provide a 32-bit build of Qt? >>> >>> This one allows to install Qt/32bits on a 32bits PC, up to Qt-5.5. >> >> Lucky raskals, we on Mac get a "Maintenance Tool" for about all Qt5 versions >> but >> that runs only on recent OS versions... and that will insist on updating >> itself >> to a version that maybe won't run on the current host. > > We (Linux users) are not as lucky as you think, the two installers > come with maintenance tools as well, but don't play together, you > would have to install them side by side (not tested). One allows you > to develop with Qt/32bits <= 5.5, while the other Qt/64bits >= 5.0 > The 32 bits comes with an old version of QtCreator, basically it's > just a frozen version of the last official Linux-32 binaries. > It might be useful for some thought. > > Anyway, there's definitely a bug on qt.io. Is anyone from the Qt > Company aware of this? > > > Chris
Another issue is that adblockers cause the download buttons to disappear: https://forum.qt.io/topic/86525/cannot-find-the-download-link I've pinged our Community Manager about the website issues (which can also be reported at https://bugreports.qt.io/ under "Qt Project Website") As for the issues related to the design of the Online Installer for Linux and macOS, I suggest creating reports under "Qt Installer Framework" Regards, Sze-Howe _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
