I should think about airports and hotels... sorry for that. But getting back to the topic, I've started build configuration as usually using GCC - without passing this flag at all. But it failed with this error:
ERROR: C++11 <random> is required and is missing or failed to compile. So I've started experimenting. Nothing changed no matter which standard I'm trying to use. 2017-12-21 2:52 GMT+01:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On quarta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2017 19:28:46 CST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > https://forum.qt.io/topic/86052/qt-5-10-0-compile-with- > clang-on-ubuntu-17-> > 10 > > > > > > Hope you are tolerating links to qt's forum here. > > > > Links are fine. But in the interest of expediency, you should post the > > actual information in the mail. In order to answer you, I need to wait > for > > the website to load, which it hasn't in the last minute since I clicked > the > > link in the airport wifi. > > > > So I can't help you. Maybe in 15 hours when I get to where I'm going. > > Ok, it loaded. > > Don't pass -c++11, -c++14 or -c++1z. Just let Qt choose the best one. > That's > valid for EVERY platform, every compiler. I wanted to get rid of that > option > altogether since users should not choose, but was overruled. > > Anyway, for Clang on Linux, that's C++14, because Clang on Linux can't > compile > the C++17 headers from libstdc++. As you've discovered. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest