On Tuesday December 19 2017 22:15:34 Jake Petroules wrote: > What about the principle of "don't remove compiler options that you do not > understand fully and/or may need"? ;)
I did ask, didn't I? :) > (and primarily on iOS) Ahhh, right, that was my hunch: one of those "let's make our Unix desktop OS behave more like a phone OS". And you wonder why I felt like tinkering? :) You're right that the errors came from linking in dependencies which I obviously didn't rebuild with the option. > It's slightly unfortunate the way this flag works, because it requires the > whole world to declare its status. I wish they'd done it in a slightly more > backwards incompatible way and required modules to explicitly state that they > are NOT app extension safe instead of the other way around. I'm not going to speculate beyond "Or maybe the whole exercise wasn't actually that necessary to begin with?" ... R _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
